THREE INDIAN SYSTEMS OF PHILOSOPHY: A SIMPLE
EXPLANATION
(Based on Sri Mukkoor Lakshmi
Narasimhacharya’s lectures)
Sruthi means
that which is heard – Cosmic vibrations which are inaudible and invisible, were
heard by the meditating Sages as sound. There are three kinds of Sruthis in the Vedas – bheda sruthi, abheda sruthi and ghataka sruthi. He is different, This is
different, He is not like this; He has qualities different from this – these
are examples of bheda sruthi. ‘All
these came out of Him; He alone is the cause for all these’ – these statements,
of themselves, show the division that He is different, this is different.
The Chandogya Upanishad declares: ‘All these are Brahman
itself’, namely, tat tvam asi. Tvam –
you; tatu – That (Brahman); asi – are. You consider yourself as ‘I’. That is
not correct. You are Brahman itself. The distinctive appearance ‘I’ has arisen
out of illusion. In his treatises on advaita
philosophy, Sri Sankara has offered excellent explanation of this. Firstly,
due to the effect of mirage, water appears to flow on the sands of the
desert. Deer thirsting for water in the
heat of the desert search the mirage in vain for water and finally, die of
unsatisfied thirst. Second example – in the dusk if a garland of flower is
lying on the ground, it may appear as a snake to the passer-by. The garland and
the apparent snake are one and the same. When the garland is recognized, the apparent
snake will go. Thus, for the appearance of the snake, the garland was the
basis. Just as the garland is mistaken for the snake, the unintelligent
persons, due to delusion, see the different universe in the place of the single
Brahman (supreme God). In fact Brahman (supreme God) is the basis for the
entire universe. What is the meaning of the statement in the Geeta ’I am in all
things. All things are in me’. In the illustration of the garland-snake,
garland is the substrate; the snake is what is super-imposed. For the terrified
person, the garland has disappeared into the snake. At that stage snake is the
basis of his view. If his ignorance is removed and he realizes that it is only
a garland, the garland has hidden the snake into itself. Then the garland
becomes the base. The unintelligent person looks on the universe as the Truth;
but in reality, God is the basis and support for the universe. For practical
purpose, we may refer to that person, this person (different persons) etc. This
inflated feeling of difference (between the universe and us) appears on account
of the mixture of the five fundamental elements such as water, air etc. This
differentiation or dual appearance (of the world and the individual) is not
true. Only Brahman is true. If He is known by whom all these appearances will
disappear, then as in the garland-snake example, the delusion (snake) will go
and the garland, namely Supreme God will be perceived.
Avidya (lack of
true knowledge) is a mirror. That mirror is quite dirty. God comes before the
mirror. If we stand before the dirty mirror, then our reflection in the mirror
too appears dirty. The differences referred to earlier appear similarly. These
are not at all true. The distinctive appearance as many entities is not true.
Only Brahman is the truth. All the rest are illusory, mere appearances.
If a genuine pearl and the
shoe-flower (japapuspa) are placed
side by side, the pearl appears to have the same colour as the flower. In
reality the pearl does not have any colour at all. Above appearances will also
happen between a crystal and a flower. Similarly none of the material in the
universe is truth; only Brahman is truth – this is the declaration of the
statement ‘Tat Tvam Asi’. The
declaration that all are Brahman is the abheda
sruthi.
The third, ghataka
sruthi, synchronises or attempts to reconcile the variations between the other
two sruthis. It states that it is the
Atman (Brahman) that indwells all the worlds and all the beings. He resides in
them and controls them whereas they know him not. He is the eternal witness (sakshi), the listener (srotra), the thinker (mantri) and the knower (jnatra). However, he is not the object
of cognition for any of the senses. He is the immortal Atman (Brahman). All
else is perishable. (Brhadaranyaka Upanishad – Antaryami-brahmana). In his Brahma
Sutra Bhashya, Sri Ramanuja reconciles the bheda, abheda sruthis.
The Dwaita philosophy
enunciates the dual nature. It states that jeeva
(the individual soul) and brahman
are different from one another (Sri Madhva).
Tat Tvam Asi –
You who are the jeeva (the individual
soul), are that Brahman – Sri
Sankara. There are no two; there is only one – this is Advaita: the self-awareness that I
am the Brahman. After
one recognizes the Truth, all the others will disappear – This is the Advaita theory.
Visishtadvaita (Sri
Ramanuja) – All material/matter are His body.
Three philosophies – one states the bheda principle; another elaborates the abheda theory. The third refers to the indweller (antaryami) in all beings.
Thus the declarations in the three sruthis have been used in the supporting arguments of the three
systems of philosophy. Matha means
idea/opinion. The three Acharyas (Gurus
or gifted teachers) enunciated the statements in the Upanishads as their own
considered opinions and they then used those portions of the Upanishads
supporting their theories.
Pramana sloka on
dwaita philosophy
SrimanMadhvaMateh Harihi Parataraha Satyam Jagat Tattvato
Bhedo Jeevaganaha Hareranucharaaha Neechochabhaavam
gataaha
Mukthihi Naijasukhaanubhuthihi, Amalaabhaktischa
Tatsaadhanam
Hyakshaaditritayam Pramanam Akhilaamnayaikavedhyo Harihi
THREE INDIAN SYSTEMS OF PHILOSOPHY: A SIMPLE
EXPLANATION
(Based on Sri Mukkoor Lakshmi
Narasimhacharya’s lectures)
Sruthi means
that which is heard – Cosmic vibrations which are inaudible and invisible, were
heard by the meditating Sages as sound. There are three kinds of Sruthis in the Vedas – bheda sruthi, abheda sruthi and ghataka sruthi. He is different, This is
different, He is not like this; He has qualities different from this – these
are examples of bheda sruthi. ‘All
these came out of Him; He alone is the cause for all these’ – these statements,
of themselves, show the division that He is different, this is different.
The Chandogya Upanishad declares: ‘All these are Brahman
itself’, namely, tat tvam asi. Tvam –
you; tatu – That (Brahman); asi – are. You consider yourself as ‘I’. That is
not correct. You are Brahman itself. The distinctive appearance ‘I’ has arisen
out of illusion. In his treatises on advaita
philosophy, Sri Sankara has offered excellent explanation of this. Firstly,
due to the effect of mirage, water appears to flow on the sands of the
desert. Deer thirsting for water in the
heat of the desert search the mirage in vain for water and finally, die of
unsatisfied thirst. Second example – in the dusk if a garland of flower is
lying on the ground, it may appear as a snake to the passer-by. The garland and
the apparent snake are one and the same. When the garland is recognized, the apparent
snake will go. Thus, for the appearance of the snake, the garland was the
basis. Just as the garland is mistaken for the snake, the unintelligent
persons, due to delusion, see the different universe in the place of the single
Brahman (supreme God). In fact Brahman (supreme God) is the basis for the
entire universe. What is the meaning of the statement in the Geeta ’I am in all
things. All things are in me’. In the illustration of the garland-snake,
garland is the substrate; the snake is what is super-imposed. For the terrified
person, the garland has disappeared into the snake. At that stage snake is the
basis of his view. If his ignorance is removed and he realizes that it is only
a garland, the garland has hidden the snake into itself. Then the garland
becomes the base. The unintelligent person looks on the universe as the Truth;
but in reality, God is the basis and support for the universe. For practical
purpose, we may refer to that person, this person (different persons) etc. This
inflated feeling of difference (between the universe and us) appears on account
of the mixture of the five fundamental elements such as water, air etc. This
differentiation or dual appearance (of the world and the individual) is not
true. Only Brahman is true. If He is known by whom all these appearances will
disappear, then as in the garland-snake example, the delusion (snake) will go
and the garland, namely Supreme God will be perceived.
The entries in this post have been repeated. This is an error. Kindly read only the first entry in full and let me have your valuable comments. Thanks
ReplyDelete